Spread of invasive plants into Minnesota through e-commerce

various species of potted plants grouped closely on a greenhouse table

Plants invasive to Minnesota that were purchased from online sellers. Credit: Domini Brown

Background

Understanding the pathways through which invasive species can spread is critical for assessing risk and making informed decisions about management. The Minnesota Invasive Terrestrial Plants and Pests Center (MITPPC) uses a prioritized funding model to support research on terrestrial invasive species that pose the greatest threats. Part of MITPPC’s evaluation process includes identifying viable pathways into the state. Many of the plants prioritized by MITPPC for research are also regulated by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) through the Minnesota Noxious Weed Law. It is illegal to sell most noxious weeds, but regulation varies by species.

As an organization that assesses risk of pathways, MITPPC assumes that if a plant can be found advertised for sale online, a viable pathway into Minnesota exists. MITPPC further assumes that if a plant is regulated by federal or Minnesota law, the pathway is considered less likely. Until this project, these assumptions had not been tested.

The ornamental plant trade is a known primary pathway of invasive plant introduction, and modern e-commerce makes it even easier. Previous research has documented the widespread availability of invasive plants through online sources, including many that ship worldwide. However, no recent studies have tested whether an online advertisement for an invasive plant results in a viable sale. Specifically, whether the purchased species matches what is received, if the plant material is alive, and if regulation affects availability.

In collaboration with the MDA, researcher Amy Morey and colleagues aimed to purchase up to five different samples of 77 different plant taxa from unique sellers and document data from the sales and items received. Of these taxa, 57 are regulated under the Minnesota Noxious Weed Law (as of 2024) and 20 are unregulated but prioritized for research by MITPPC. 

Research questions

  • Is an online advertisement for a plant equal to a viable pathway into Minnesota?
  • Do sellers note whether a species is potentially problematic?
  • Do sellers refuse a sale due to existing regulation of a species?
  • If material is successfully purchased and received, is it viable?
  • Are regulated species less available and/or less likely to be sold than those that are unregulated?

Research team

Amy Morey | principal investigator

Rob Venette | co-principal investigator

Emilie Justen | collaborator

Collaborating organization

Minnesota Department of Agriculture